琉球群岛法律地位的国际法多维辨析——兼论其对东海大陆架划界的影响  

A Multidimensional Analysis of the Legal Status of the Ryukyu Islands and Its Influence on the Demarcation of the East China Sea Shelf

作　　者：孙传香[1] 

机构地区：[1]邵阳学院政法系,湖南邵阳422000

出　　处：《邵阳学院学报（社会科学版）》2015年第4期61-65,共5页Journal of Shaoyang University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"中日东海大陆架划界国际法问题研究"(12CFX099);湖南省社科基金项目"钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿主权归属及其划界效力研究"(12YBB227)

摘　　要：在中日东海大陆架划界争端中,琉球群岛的法律地位直接决定日本提出的以中间线划分东海大陆架及专属经济区的主张是否具有合理性与合法性。在日琉两国关系中,日本曾一度依据传统国际法取得琉球群岛的主权,二战结束后,日本接受反法西斯同盟提出的条约履行义务,将琉球置于联合国托管制度之下,表明日本放弃了对琉球的主权。作为联合国的成员国,美国在结束对琉球托管后抛开联合国托管制度单独与日本签订归还冲绳的相关协议将琉球归还日本,违背了《联合国宪章》规定的托管制度,日本当前主张琉球群岛的主权无国际法。In the Sino —Japanese dispute of the demarcation of the East China Sea Shelf,the legal status of the Ryukyu Islands is extremely important,if it belongs to Japan,Japan is qualified to claim the right to demarcate the East China Sea. It is true that Ryukyu was once subjugated by Japan,however,Japan abandoned the sovereignty of Ryukyu by accepting the Cairo Communiqué and the Proclamation Calling for the Surrender of Japan after World War Ⅱ and agreed to make Ryukyu mandated territory controlled by the United States. As a member of the United Nations,it is not right for the United States to return privately Ryukyu to Japan because it seriously contravened the U. N. Charter.

关 键 词：琉球群岛 东海大陆架 领土主权 联合国 

分 类 号：D993[政治法律—国际法学]