检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢华[1] 张志远[1] 张俊丽[1] 刘美岑[1] 宋迪[1] 赵海涛[1] 马壮[1] 陈萍[1]
机构地区:[1]沈阳军区总医院呼吸和变态反应疾病诊治中心,沈阳辽宁110016
出 处:《临床肺科杂志》2015年第10期1805-1807,共3页Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine
基 金:辽宁省自然科学基金(No 201202244)
摘 要:目的分析住院哮喘患者行机械通气治疗情况。方法采取回顾性方法,收集6年内住院哮喘患者中行机械通气治疗的患者年龄、性别、所患疾病种类和住院费用等临床资料,分别进行统计和分类汇总。结果2009~2014年共有1327哮喘患者住院治疗,行机械通气的患者占6.6%,其中行无创机械通气治疗占3.4%,有创机械通气占3.2%。行机械通气治疗哮喘患者倾向于高龄、入住ICU,出现Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭。有创机械通气治疗组与无创治疗组和非机械通气组比较,肺炎、糖尿病、脑血管病和。肾功能不全等伴发疾病多。无创机械通气治疗组患者,男性多,合并支气管扩张多,冠心病、肝功能不全等合并症与非机械通气组相似。进一步进行危险因素分析,发现无创机械通气危险因素较少,只有年龄大于65岁、男性、入住ICU、出现Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭和合并支气管扩张;有创机械通气的危险因素较多,为年龄大于65岁、入住ICU、出现Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭、合并肺炎、冠心病、糖尿病、脑血管疾病和肝、肾功能不全。非机械通气哮喘住院患者住院人均费用为11667元,而机械通气治疗的住院哮喘患者人均费用42460元,与非机械通气患者比较,差异有显著性统计学意义(P〈0.05)。住院非机械通气哮喘患者死亡率为0.20%,无创通气治疗组死亡率为2.2%,有创通气治疗组死亡率为27.9%,各组间差异有显著统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论高龄和合并症是导致患者行机械通气治疗的主要原因。Objective To analyze the curative effect of mechanical ventilation in the treatment of inpatients with asthma. Methods The clinical data of inpatients with asthma received mechanical ventilation during recent 6 years were retrospectively analyzed, including age, sex, type of illness and hospitalization costs. Results there were a total of 1327 cases of asthmatic patients from 2009 to 2014, and 6.6% of them were given mechanical ventilation, including 3.4% of non-invasive mechanical ventilation and 3.2% of invasive mechanical ventilation. Those patients received mechanical ventilation were tend to be senior citizens, staying in ICU and complicating with type ]/ respira- tory failure. The incidence of pneumonia, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease and renal failure was higher in the venti- lation group than in the control group. The non-invasive mechanical ventilation group had the characteristics of more male and bronchieetasis. Further analysis of the risk factors found that the risk factors of non-invasive mechanical ventilation only included older than 65 years, male, stay in ICU, type ]1 respiratory failure and bronchiectasis, but the risk factors of invasive mechanical ventilation included older than 65 years, stay in ICU, type 1I respiratory fail- ure, pneumonia, coronary heart disease, diabetes, cerebrovaseular disease, and liver and kidney dysfunction. The average hospitalization cost was 11,667 yuan for non-ventilation patients, and 42,460 yuan for ventilation patients ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The mortality of the non-ventilation group was 0. 2% , 2. 2% of the non-invasive ventilation group, and 27. 9% of the invasive ventilation group ( P 〈 O. 05 ). Conclusion The main risk factors causing asthma inpatients received mechanical ventilation are old age and complications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.254.237