检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李金萍[1]
出 处:《阜阳师范学院学报(社会科学版)》2015年第4期35-38,共4页Journal of Fuyang Normal University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:庄子将"道"回落到现实与人生层面时,提出了对"精神自由"的向往与追求。由于庄子的自由观是以对现实社会的不满与无奈为基础,以此抛弃世俗去追求"精神故乡",这种类似"出世"的情怀与佛教的自由观有可比较之处。以《庄子》内篇为依据,通过对庄子自由思想和佛教自由思想的起源、实质、实现前提和方式的比较,来阐释二者的异同,并对庄子之自由的局限做适当的评析。Chuang-Tzu proposed the pursuit of "spiritual freedom" when he talked about "Tao" in the real life. Chuang-Tzu's concept of freedom is based on the unsatisfied and helplessness of social reality and to abandon the secular to pursue "spiritual homeland". The detached thought is similar to the freedom theory of Buddhism. Taking the inner chapters of the Chuang-Tzu as the basis, this paper study on the Chuang-Tzu idea of freedom and the Buddhist liberal thought's origin, essence, approach to explain the similarities and differences. And some comments on the limitations of Chuang-Tzu freedom thoughts have been proposed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.72.3