对《专利法》确立惩罚性赔偿的质疑——一个实证研究的视角  

Query about Introducing Punitive Damages System into Patent Law:An Empirical Perspective

作　　者：王果[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学法学院,天津300071

出　　处：《沈阳大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第4期505-509,共5页Journal of Shenyang University:Social Science

摘　　要：惩罚性赔偿在遏制专利侵权方面,较之补偿性赔偿确有天然优势。但若要上升为现实的法律制度,则必须在必要性、必然性和预期效果等方面均能通过论证。从实践来看,即使放弃大陆法系对补偿性原则,引入惩罚性赔偿制度也并非必然必要之举。专利权人赔偿不足的真正原因更多在于权利人自己的疏忽或法官们对补偿性赔偿功能的忽视,由此导致"补偿性赔偿导致维权入不敷出"的理由言过其实。同时惩罚性赔偿发挥作用的理论前提在实践中难以满足,国内外实践表明,该制度运行的效果并不理想,带来的负面效果不易消除。Compared with compensatory damages,punitive damages do have a natural advantage in containing patent infringement.But only when its necessity,inevitability and effect can all through the argument,the law will be confirmed.And from the point of practice,even if of the compensatory principle the civil law is given up,introducing the punitive compensation system is not necessary.The real culprit that compensation is not sufficient to cover the loss is the function of compensatory damages has been distorted for obligee＇s own negligence or judges＇ignorance.The necessity that supporters emphasize＂compensatory damages break the pale＂is questionable.At the same time,the theory premise of punitive damages is hard to meet in reality,moreover,existing practice both at home and abroad show that the operation of such system is not ideal.In addition,the ill effects of punitive damages cannot be eliminated.

关 键 词：专利侵权 惩罚性赔偿 补偿性赔偿 

分 类 号：D923.8[政治法律—民商法学]