推行深圳医事仲裁模式须先行解决的问题探讨  

Pushing Shenzhen medical arbitration mode must solve two problems primarily

作　　者：马文建[1] 

机构地区：[1]深圳市龙岗区妇幼保健院,广东深圳市518172

出　　处：《中国卫生法制》2015年第4期83-86,共4页China Health Law

摘　　要：深圳市采用仲裁方式处理医患纠纷已四年。运行实践证明:实施一裁终局模式处理医患纠纷确能兼顾中立性、权威性与高效率。尽管深圳医事仲裁模式推出后曾备受学者们的推崇,但该模式在我国其他城市能否复制,甚至在完善后能否向全国推行,无论是医务界还是仲裁界仍有不少争议。根据深圳等相关仲裁机构开展医事仲裁的实践可以得出:启动并长期开展类似深圳这种一裁终局模式的医患纠纷仲裁处理方式必须先从制度层面明确医事仲裁的合法性,同时需解决好医事仲裁运转费用来源的问题。The arbitration mode dealing with medical disputes has been operated for four years in Shenzhen.The practice shows that implementation of the ruling mode dealing with medical disputes do neutrality,authoritative,and efficient.Although Shenzhen medical arbitration mode once was promoted by some related theoretical research scholars,it still has some debate about whether the model can be copied in other cities in China or around the country,both in medical industry or in medical arbitration industry.According to the practice in Shenzhen,the legitimacy and the operating funds should be solved before implementing the mode just as Shenzhen done.

关 键 词：医事仲裁 合法性 仲裁费用 

分 类 号：D901[政治法律—法学理论]