从《唐钞文选集注汇存》诗的部分略窥《文选》五臣注的问题(下)  

Briefly on the Issues of Five-scholar Annotations of Literary Selection in the Poem Parts of Tang Chao Wen Xuan Ji Zhu Hui Cun( Part Ⅱ)

作　　者：朱晓海[1] 

机构地区：[1]台湾新竹清华大学中文系所,台湾新竹30013

出　　处：《学术交流》2015年第9期144-154,共11页Academic Exchange

摘　　要：《文选》五臣注本在中唐到两宋之交的流传过程中,多遭窜改,变化颇多。以《选》诗为代表,通过对照《唐钞本集注汇存》与明州六臣《注》本、陈八郎本的五臣《注》,可以清楚看出个中奥秘。作为最接近原本的唐钞本,《集注》与南宋时期的明州本、陈本的五臣《注》内容有明显差异。明州本与陈本从多方剿袭资料,增入书中,因而其注文比之《集注》要丰富得多。至于各本注文署名不一的问题,有些是由于各注家的注文重叠,结集之时不同版本署名不一之缘故,有些恐怕就是后世增益者任意之举了。The Five-scholar Annotations of Literary Selection were changed many times when it spread out from the Middle Tang Dynasty to the Northern and Southern Song Dynasties. With the reference of representative Literary Selection,we could reveal their connotations after comparing Tang Chao Wen Xuan Ji Zhu Hui Cun and six-Scholar Annotations of the Ming State,and five-scholar Annotations compiled by Chen Balang. As the version closest to the original,Ji Zhu differs from the version of Ming State and Chen Ben's five-scholar Annotations. However,both of the latter collected many other materials and enriched Ji Zhu. As for different signatures of each version of annotations,some came from overlapped annotations while being compiled into collections,and others were coined by arbitrary addition of authors.

关 键 词：《唐钞本集注汇存》 明州六臣《注》本 陈八郎本 五臣《注》 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]