内地与香港廉政建设责任制比较研究  

A Comparative Study of the Accountability of Clean Government Building in the Mainland and Hong Kong

作　　者：袁柏顺[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南大学廉政研究中心,湖南长沙410082

出　　处：《广州大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第6期5-11,19,共8页Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：教育部重大攻关项目(11JZD045);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(13YJAZH124)

摘　　要：作为腐败预防的重要举措,香港自1970年代开始探索廉政建设责任制问题,大陆则从1998年开始实行党风廉政建设责任制。通过对两地廉政建设责任制责任内容的比较研究,可以发现二者之间的异同。将廉政建设责任制的责任主体的廉洁诚信纳入责任制的首要内容,并适当限制或削减责任主体在腐败行为调查与惩处方面的责任,可以使廉政建设责任制更好地发挥效能。As one of measures for corruption prevention, Accountability of Clean Government Building （AOCGB） has been adoptedin Hong Kong since the late 1970s and in the mainland since 1998. A comparative study focused on the contents of AOCGB could identify the similarities and difference of AOCGB in the jurisdic- tions. It is argued that the responsibility of the integrity of leaders or the accountability shoulders should be added and the responsibility of investigation and punishment of corrupt practices should be limited, in order that AOCGB could be more effective.

关 键 词：廉政建设责任制 腐败预防 香港廉政公署 腐败控制 治理 

分 类 号：D630.9[政治法律—政治学]