《直隶河渠书》公案与引发问题述论  

The Detective of ZHILIHEQUSHU and the Controversy It Caused

作　　者：宋开金[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学历史学院,北京100875

出　　处：《聊城大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第5期1-6,68,共7页Journal of Liaocheng University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：《直隶河渠书》是乾隆年间由直隶总督方观承主持,延请当时知名学者参与编纂的一部水利志书,但因种种原因并未成书。嘉庆十三年,试用通判王履泰向朝廷进献《畿辅安澜志》,戴震嗣子戴中孚认为此书攘窃了《直隶河渠书》,因此携带书稿赴京辩论未果,《直隶河渠书》公案便由此引发,引起了众多学者如段玉裁、魏源、缪荃孙、梁启超、孟森、胡适等人的关注。公案引发出许多问题,如著作权问题、两书关系问题、卷数问题、编纂者问题等。目前,一些重要问题已经得到基本解决,如《直隶河渠书》的著作权问题、《畿辅安澜志》与《直隶河渠书》的关系问题,但仍有一些问题值得学界进一步研究。ZHILIHEQUSHU is compiled by famous scholars who employed by Zhili governor Fang Guancheng, but because of various reasons not completed. Thirteen years Jiaqing, Wang Lvtai offered JIFUANLANZHI to the court, Dai Zhen＇ s son Dai Zhongfu think this book was a copy of ZHILIHEQUSHU, but his argument was not successful, the academic debate has been triggered, and attracted the attention of many scholars. This incident caused a lot of controversy, some have been resolved, some have not resolved

关 键 词：直隶河渠书 公案 水利志书 

分 类 号：K249.3[历史地理—历史学]