我国民法典编纂中时效立法的三个问题  

Three Issues on Prescription Legislations

作　　者：房绍坤[1] 

机构地区：[1]烟台大学,山东烟台265400

出　　处：《法学杂志》2015年第9期1-11,共11页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：在时效立法上,我国应当采取分别立法模式,于总则编规定诉讼时效,于物权编规定取得时效。诉讼时效不宜改称消灭时效,应继续采用诉讼时效的称谓。诉讼时效应区分普通诉讼时效和最长诉讼时效,期间分别确定为3年和20年。In the course of prescription legislation, limitation and prescription should be regulated separately, the former should be regulated in the general part and the latter should be regulated in property law. We should continue to adopt the name of limitation. Limitation should be distinguished between the ordinary limitation with 3 years and the maximum limitation with 20 years.

关 键 词：消灭时效 诉讼时效 取得时效 时效期间 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]