治理转型遵循线性逻辑吗?——台湾地区城市社区治理转型的考察  

Dose Governance Transition Follow a Linear Logic?: A case study from Taiwan Urban Community Governance Transformation

作　　者：吴晓林[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学公共管理学院行政管理系

出　　处：《南京社会科学》2015年第9期96-103,共8页Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部社科青年项目"后单位制时代的城市社区建设:治理转型与社区整合"(12YJC810026);国家社科基金青年项目"城市社区业主维权的社会冲突及其整合机制研究"(13CZZ030);湖南省社科基金项目"湖南省商品住宅社区治理现代化研究"(14YBA387)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：人们惯于使用"从管制到治理"、"从单边主义到多元共治"来描述治理转型,却忽视了对治理转型实际过程的考察。实则,要理解治理转型,必须将不同治理阶段视为一个"连续统"进行历史性、整体性的研究,继而回答"治理转型是否遵循线性逻辑"这个命题。本文以台湾地区推动城市社区治理转型为例,分析中国情境下治理转型的真实奥秘。研究发现,由于"公民社会"的先天不足以及"社区主义"的缺乏,台湾地区的社区治理转型主要借由"以自上而下推动自下而上"的机制,形成了过渡时期的"辅导型社区治理"形态。这种貌似"背反"的特殊逻辑,尽管有力推动了治理的转型,但是也埋藏着诸如"依赖政府"、"社区发展失衡"诸多问题。由此,也可以看出,治理转型并非符应简单的线性逻辑,应当视整体环境和能力情况而定。Most people are accustomed to using the term ＂from government to governance＂ or ＂from unilateralism administration to a pluralistic cooperation＂ to describe the governance transformation, while ignore the actual transition process. It is necessary to regard different stages of governance as a ＂continuum＂, introducing a historical research. In this paper, I studied how the model of urban community governance were transformed in Taiwan to answer the the question of ＇ dose governance transition follow a linear logic？＇. The research shows, due to the lack of inherent civil society and communitarism, a transitional model of community governance were built in Taiwan, mainly with the mechanism of ＂bottom-up driven by top-down ＂ Also this transitional mechanism accompanied with some problems as ＂to heavily rely on government＂ or ＂unbanlanced coriamunity development＂. It can be seen that the governance transition does not simply follow a linear logic, which should be regarded as a connection embodied in the overall environment and conditions.

关 键 词：治理转型 台湾社区治理 自下而上 辅导型社区 

分 类 号：D638[政治法律—政治学]