检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶圣永[1] 程超[1] 唐权[1] 戴松灵[1] 朱国俊[1]
机构地区:[1]国网四川省电力公司经济技术研究院,四川成都610041
出 处:《电力系统保护与控制》2015年第18期138-143,共6页Power System Protection and Control
摘 要:BPA程序应用于计算短路电流时采取不同的计算方法、计算模式,将导致结果存在较大差异,影响电网规划决策。结合国内现行的短路电流计算标准,分析了在不同计算方法中对节点运行电压的不同假定,以及不同计算模式下线路充电功率和负荷模型构建的区别,讨论了由此引起的短路阻抗、短路电流计算差异。以新英格兰10机39节点改进测试系统和四川电网2020年规划网架进行三相短路电流仿真研究,分析比较基于BPA的不同计算方法、计算模式下短路电流值,提出了理论分析结果,建议了适合四川电网规划的短路电流计算模式。BPA short-circuit current calculation software is widely used in China, however, with the same source data its calculation result differs under different calculation conditions or with different methods and thus affects power grid planning and decision-making. With consideration of current calculation standards for short-circuit current, different assumptions for node operating voltage in different calculation methods are analyzed, the diferences of line charging power and load model construction with different calculation modes are analyzed, and the resulting differences of short circuit impedance and current calculation are discussed. Using improved New England 39 bus system and Sichuan power grid planning architecture in 2020 as examples, short-circuit current calculation results under different calculation conditions and with different methods based on BPA are compared to verify the variation of the theoretical analysis. Finally, some suggestions for the choice of short-circuit current standards are made.
分 类 号:TM713[电气工程—电力系统及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229