检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡燕[1] 貌达 刘泽[1] 姜棋予 谢国明[1] 白冰珂[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军第三○二医院实验技术研究保障中心,北京100039 [2]中国食品药品检定研究院艾滋病性病病毒疫苗室,北京100050
出 处:《传染病信息》2015年第4期207-209,共3页Infectious Disease Information
基 金:国家自然基金青年基金(81000735)
摘 要:目的调查不同人群中新型呼肠病毒既往感染情况。方法选取健康人群以及手足口病、腹泻、麻疹、乙型肝炎等患者的血清标本,利用微量中和试验检测其血清标本中新型呼肠病毒IgG抗体。结果中和试验结果表明,健康人群中新型呼肠病毒IgG抗体阳性率为29.90%,抗体滴度的中位数为1:32;手足口病患者中抗体阳性率为70.83%,抗体滴度的中位数为1:64;乙型肝炎和麻疹患者抗体阳性率分别为90.22%和90.70%,抗体滴度的中位数均为1:128;腹泻患者中抗体阳性率和抗体滴度的中位数均最高,分别为100%和1:256。结论健康人群与不同疾病患者中薪型呼肠病毒特异性IgG抗体阳性率及滴度存在显著差异。Objective To evaluate the prevalence of past infection with a novel reovirus in different populations. Methods The serum samples were taken from 97 healthy people and 219 patients with hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD), diarrhea, measles and hepatitis B treated in our hospital. The prevalence of the novel reovirus-specific IgG antibody in sera was detected by using a neutraliza-tion assay. Results The neutralization assay demonstrated that the positive rates of the novel reovirus-specific IgG antibody were 29.90%in healthy controls, 70.83%in HFMD group, 90.22%in hepatitis B group, 90.70%in measles group and 100%in diarrhea group, and the median IgG antibody titers were 1∶32, 1∶64, 1∶128, 1∶128 and 1∶256 in those groups respectively. Conclusions The positive rates and titers of a novel reovirus-specific IgG antibody are significantly different between the healthy population and patients with different diseases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.131.108