危险驾驶行为入罪的必要性与可行性——以《刑法修正案(九)》的相关规定为视角  

Necessity and Feasibility of the Criminalization of Dangerous Driving Behaviors——from the Perspective of the Relevant Provisions in Amendment Ⅸ to Criminal Law

作　　者：彭文华[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《法学论坛》2015年第5期23-31,共9页Legal Forum

基　　金：作者主持的教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目<罪量视野下的犯罪论体系诸问题之困境与出路>(11YJC820091)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：将危险驾驶行为予以入罪的必要性是相关的危险驾驶行为必须具有相当程度的危险性,且具有一定的普遍性;可行性是对相关的危险驾驶行为在认定与取证上具有明确性与可操作性,能确保其受到惩罚。《刑法修正案(九)》将"双超"入罪限定为从事校车业务或旅客运输"双超"的做法是欠妥的,不应将从事公路货运"双超"排除在危险驾驶罪的处罚范围之外。将违规运输危险化学品的行为予以入罪具有可行性与必要性,但仍有空白之处。将毒驾、怒驾行为入罪不具有可行性,危险驾驶行为入罪的范围不宜过于扩张。As far as the criminalization of dangerous driving behaviors is concerned, the necessity is that it has considerable degree of risk and the occurrence of the behavior has certain tmiversality, and the feasibility is that there are clearness and operability in the determination and evidence collection so that the punishment is guaranteed to be possible. It is undesirable for Amendment IX to Criminal Law to exclude the ＂double super＂ of road freight transport from the scope of the crime of dangerous driving. It is feasible and necessary for illegal transport of dangerous chemicals to be criminalized, but regret still exists. The criminalization of driving after taking addictive drugs and driving with anger is not feasible. The scope of the criminalization of dangerous driving behaviors should not be too expansive.

关 键 词：危险驾驶 追逐竞驶 毒驾 怒驾 

分 类 号：D924.32[政治法律—刑法学]