我国行政程序卷宗阅览权的确认与司法救济  被引量:4

Legal Confirmation and Judicial Remedy of Reading Dossier in China

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:郭兵[1] 

机构地区:[1]浙江大学光华法学院,浙江杭州310008

出  处:《法学论坛》2015年第5期51-57,共7页Legal Forum

摘  要:随着我国政府信息公开的深入推进,行政知情权逐步衍生出政府信息公开请求权和卷宗阅览权两种不同类型的具体权利。在司法个案与司法解释的共同作用下,卷宗阅览权得以具象化。与政府信息公开请求权不同,卷宗阅览权在我国尚缺乏完善的法律保障制度。通过有效的法律创设机制对卷宗阅览权加以确认和规范,具有重要的现实意义。卷宗阅览权司法救济的困境,反映了"重实体、轻程序"的传统立场。在我国特定的法治背景下,引入预防性行政诉讼机制可以有效实现卷宗阅览权的司法保障。With the deep propel of the disclosure of government information in China, the two specific fights, the fight to claim the disclosure of government information and the fight of reading dossier, gradually derive from the right to know in administra- tion. The combined effect of the judicial case and judicial interpretations make the right of reading dossier reifiable. Different from the fight to claim the disclosure of government information, there is still no perfect legal protection system of the right of reading dossier now. The legal confirmation of the right of reading dossier has the important practical significance. The judicial remedy dilemma of the fight of reading dossier reflects the traditional standpoint of regarding substantiality and depreciating procedure. In the specific context of the rule of law in China, the introducing of preventive administrative litigation can realizing the judicial guarantee of the right of reading dossier effectively.

关 键 词:行政知情权 卷宗阅览权 法律确认 司法救济 

分 类 号:D912.11[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象