检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕颜冰[1]
出 处:《档案学通讯》2015年第5期87-93,共7页Archives Science Bulletin
摘 要:国际档案界对于尊重全宗、尊重来源、尊重原始顺序的来源原则存在两种不同的阐释和应用,分别是基于全宗和基于系列的方法,这两种方法的核心区别在于对于定义来源的视角和方法不同。本文论述了文件系列的提出历程、基本内涵、国际回应、实践运用及推行障碍,最后得出文件系列方法的提出是以维护档案的证据性为基本出发点的,文件系列方法的运用应正确处理文件内容信息与文件背景信息的关系,文件系列方法的适用性应通过推动档案理论指导档案工作实践的实证研究得出评判的结论。The international archival archivists have two different interpretation and application lines of the principle of provenance which includes respect of fond, respect of provenance,and respect for original order.One is fond-based approach,advocated heavily in Canada,and the other is series-based approach which finds its roots in Australian and widely applied within its homeland.The core differences of these two approaches are differing perspectives and approaches to defining provenance.The paper discussed origins,con- notations, international reactions,practical applications ,current existing implementation obstacles of the record series approach and system,ultimately concluded that record series is an evidence-based approach, and that the relationship between record subject content and contextual information should be correctly han- dled in its application,and that evaluation of suitability should be derived from empirical study through putting archival theories into conducting archival practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222