住房补贴对住房消费、劳动供给的影响测度——基于湖北省五城市廉租住房保障家庭的数据分析  

Measuring the Effects of Housing Subsidies on Housing Consumption and Labor Supply: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Survey Data of Five Cities in Hubei Province

作　　者：邓宏乾[1,2] 贾傅麟[1] 方菲雅 

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学经济与工商管理学院,430079 [2]湖北师范学院经济与管理学院,435002

出　　处：《经济评论》2015年第5期100-110,153,共12页Economic Review

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目"我国住房保障问题与改革创新研究"(项目编号:11&ZD039)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：本文利用2013年湖北省五个城市的廉租住房保障家庭的入户调查数据,分别测度了实物配租、租赁补贴两种补贴政策对保障家庭的住房消费、劳动供给的影响。结果表明:在住房消费方面,两种补贴政策均有住房消费促进效应,实物配租的住房消费促进效应大于租赁补贴;在劳动供给方面,两种补贴政策均对劳动供给有抑制作用,存在福利陷阱问题,但实物配租的福利陷阱程度较为严重。基于结论,本文建议住房补贴宜采用配物补租、社会房东补贴、租房券和购房补贴相结合的方式,制定出多层次、反梯度的补贴标准体系,实施过程中应以就业为导向优化保障房的选址布局、建立就业援助机制。This paper uses the survey data of tive cities in Hubel province in 2013, to measure the effects of project-based subsidy and rental subsidy on housing consumption and labor supply. The results show that both of housing subsidies have housing consumption promoting effects, but the effects of rental subsidy is higher for high-income recipients than for the low-income group, that is the reason why its promoting effect is lower than that of project-based subsidy. From the aspect of labor supply, both of housing subsidies have depressed the performance of the recipients in labor market, which caused them dropping into welfare trap. In terms of degree, the depth of trap that project-based subsidy caused is deeper than that of rental subsidy. Based on conclusions, this paper suggests that government should adopt different types of subsidy in accordance with specific conditions, such as subsidy on public housing, social landlord subsidies, housing voucher and purchase subsidies. Developing a subsidy standard system with multi-level and anti-gradient based on the recipients＇ housing affordability. Taking employment as a guidance to optimize the layout of the public housing, and set up a mechanism of employment assistance.

关 键 词：保障性住房 住房补贴 住房消费 劳动供给 福利陷阱 

分 类 号：F299.23[经济管理—国民经济]