Rural Collective Construction Land Transfer Based on Stakeholder Analysis  

基于利益协调机制的农村集体建设用地入市路径选择（英文）

作　　者：石敏俊[1,2] 王宏娟[1,3] 谢俊奇[3] 尚志远[1,2] 周丁扬[4] 

机构地区：[1]中国科学院大学,北京100049 [2]中国科学院虚拟经济与数据科学研究中心,北京100190 [3]北京市国土资源局,北京100013 [4]北京师范大学,北京100875

出　　处：《Journal of Resources and Ecology》2015年第3期155-163,共9页资源与生态学报（英文版）

摘　　要：In order to establish a unified construction land market, it is necessary to choose a rational pathway for the market transfer of Rural Collective Construction Land （RCCL） in China. This paper focuses on different methods of RCCL transfer based on stakeholder analysis and three case studies including models from Guangdong, Wuhu and Chongqing. The main finding is that all three models improved resource allocation efficiency and intensive utilization of RCCL through land and capital transfer. Each model built different interest coordination mechanisms among stakeholders, suited to different regions and cases. The Guangdong model is suitable for an economically developed region. The Wuhu model is suitable for developing regions in central China while western underdeveloped regions in China can adopt the Chongqing model. The policy implication is that better policy making for the promotion of RCCL transfer in China should consider regional characteristics as well as the economic development context.建立城乡统一的建设用地市场亟需解决农村集体建设用地入市路径问题,文章通过芜湖、广东、重庆三地模式实践研究,探索不同地区集体建设用地入市路径选择。通过分析三地模式实践安排和利益协调机制的利弊,发现三种模式在促进土地资源优化配置和集约利用、实现土地与资本市场的流动均起到了良好作用,但是利益协调机制的差异导致其适用性不同。广东模式适用于经济发达地区,芜湖模式更适用于中部发展中地区,西部欠发达地区则可借鉴重庆模式。由此得出,各地区在推动农村集体建设用地入市时,因结合区域特点和经济发展方向,选择不同的集体建设用地入市路径。

关 键 词：Rural Collective Construction Land Market Transfer Path Choice Coordination of StakeholderInterest 

分 类 号：F321.1[经济管理—产业经济]