两种不同方法检测医护人员手卫生质量结果比较  

Comparion the result of two test methods to the medical personnel hand hygiene quality

作　　者：贾平骜[1] 黄牧[1] 

机构地区：[1]沈阳市疾病预防控制中心,辽宁沈阳110031

出　　处：《中国消毒学杂志》2015年第9期887-888,891,共3页Chinese Journal of Disinfection

摘　　要：目的比较两种方法检测医护人员手卫生质量结果。方法采用ATP生物荧光法和细菌定量培养方法,对医疗机构门诊医务人员手卫生质量进行检测与分析。结果用ATP荧光检测法检测医疗机构门诊医务人员手卫生质量合格率为69.17%,用细菌定量培养法检测医疗机构门诊医护人员手卫生质量合格率为78.20%,配对卡方检验差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。两种方法检测结果均显示,公立医疗机构门诊医护人员手卫生合格率高于民营医疗机构,护士手卫生合格率高于医生。结论细菌定量培养法对手卫生监测合格率高于ATP荧光检测法,但后者操作简单快速。Objective To compare the results of two methods of medical personnel hand hygiene quality test. Methods ATP bioluminescence assay and bacterial quantitative culture methods were used to detect and analyze outpatient medical personnel hand hygiene quality. Results The pass rate of ATP fluorescence detection method was 69.17% for outpatient medical personnel hand hygiene quality, while the pass rate of bacterial quantitative culture method was 78.20%. Paired chi - square difference was statistically significant （P 〈 0.01 ）. Two methods of test results showed that pass rate of public medical institution outpatient hand hygiene was higher than that of private medical institutions, and pass rate of outpatient service nurse hand hygiene was higher than that of doctor. Conclusion The pass rate of bacterial quantitative culture method of hand hygiene monitoring is higher than that of the ATP fluorescence detection method, but the latter is simple and rapid.

关 键 词：生物荧光法 细菌培养法 医务人员手卫生 检测 

分 类 号：R184.6[医药卫生—流行病学]