混合制违宪审查模式探究  

An Exploration on Mixed System of Constitutional Review Mode

作　　者：郭婷婷[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《山东工会论坛》2015年第4期78-80,88,共4页Shandong Trade Unions＇ Tribune

摘　　要：当前我国违宪审查缺乏专门的机关,缺乏系统完备的监督、保障程序,监督权交错重叠,导致有的机关要受到多重部门的监督。这种多重监督的现象导致监督效率低下,甚至会出现没有监督的局面。宪法争议的裁决不应当只是由人民代表大会进行,至少应设立专门的机构或是与全国人大及其常委会一起合理分工来进行违宪审查。我国应该建立全国人大及其常委会与宪法监督委员会、人民法院共同进行违宪审查的混合体制。Currently, constitutional review in our country is lack of specialized institution, systematic and perfect supervision procedures. Rights of supervision are overlapped, which lead some organizations to be supervised by many departments. This phenomenon will produce lower supervising efficiency and even situation of no supervising. The arbitration of constitutional dispute should not only be continued by People's Congress, at least a specialized organization should be built or NPC and its standing committee member divide labor rationally to complete constitutional review.Our country should build up a mixed system of constitutional review done by National People Congress and its standing committee members, constitutional watch-dog committee and people's court.

关 键 词：违宪审查模式 宪法监督委员会 宪法法院 

分 类 号：D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]