检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国医院管理》2015年第9期66-68,共3页Chinese Hospital Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71303024)
摘 要:目的研究购置审批决策活动中利益相关方决策行为与偏好,并提出优化设备审批的建议。方法通过向设备审批活动的利益相关方发放情景问卷,并借鉴认知心理学透镜模型进行实证分析。结果在大型医疗设备采购活动中,不同决策者的决策质量存在显著的组间差异,事务所组的判断质量最高,政府机构组最低;使用人次的决策有用性最低,诊断准确率的决策有用性最高。结论 (1)加强注册会计师在设备审批中的第三方评价作用,以优化医院设备购置的审批流程;(2)依据透镜模型调整医疗设备构置的绩效评价指标体系。Objective To study the decision-making behavior and preferences of stakeholders in the medical equip- ment purchase decision-making activities. And to make recommendations to optimize the device for approval. Methods By issuing the situation questionnaires to the benefit stakeholders of the medical device approval to do empirical analy- sis based on cognitive psychology lens model Results In large medical equipment procurement activities, differences of the approval decision to judge the quality of medical devices of different decision makers exist between different groups. Group CPA's consistency is the highest, and government agency group is the lowest. The diagnostic accuracy to make decision is the highest, and attendance is the lowest. Conclusion (1) Strengthening the third party accreditation of CPA in equipment approval can optimize the approval process of hospital equipment allocation. (2) Perfor- mance evaluation system should be adjusted based on the model of the lens when the medical equipments are pur- chased.
分 类 号:R197.32[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112