检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆医科大学附属第一医院,重庆市400016 [2]华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院
出 处:《中国全科医学》2015年第25期3010-3015,共6页Chinese General Practice
基 金:2010年国家临床重点专科护理建设项目(财社[2010]305号基金)
摘 要:目的建立健康管理师核心胜任力评价指标体系,为我国健康管理师人才队伍的职业化和人才的培训、考核及评价提供参考。方法采用文献回顾、半结构化访谈等质性研究方法,初步建立健康管理师核心胜任力评价指标框架并编制专家函询问卷。采用德尔菲专家函询法,通过两轮函询,由专家对指标重要性进行评分,根据专家意见的协调程度和集中程度,对指标进行增减、修改,并采用层次分析法确定一级指标权重,采用百分权重法和乘积法确定二、三级指标权重。结果两轮专家函询表的回收率分别为80.0%(24/30)和95.8%(23/24);专家整体权威系数为0.79;指标总体协调系数为0.254(P<0.01),各级指标的专家协调系数分别为0.362、0.296、0.230(P<0.01)。最终构建了由5个一级指标、13个二级指标、46个三级指标及其权重构成的评价指标体系。结论本研究构建了健康管理师核心胜任力评价指标体系,所确立的指标体系具有科学性和实用性,可作为衡量健康管理师核心胜任力的考评工具。Objective To establish a core competency evaluation index system for health management professionals and provide references for training,assessment,evaluation and professionalization of health management professional personnel in China. Methods By literature review, semi - structured interview and other qualitative research methods, we build a preliminary frame for the core competency evaluate index system for health management professionals and designed a specialist consultative questionnaire. Using Delphi method,we acquired the scores given by specialists on the importance of indexes through two round of consultation by letters. According to specialists&#39; opinions on coordination degree and concentration degree,the indicators were added,deleted and modified. We determined the first - grade index weight by AHP method,and determined the second - grade and third - grade index weight by percentage weight method and arithmetic product method. Results The questionnaire recovery rates of the two rounds of consultation were 80. 0%(24 / 30) and 95. 8% (23 / 24)respectively. The overall specialist authoritative coefficient was 0. 79,the overall coordination coefficient was 0. 254 ( P 〈 0. 01 ),and the specialist coordination coefficients of the indicators of the three levels were 0. 362,0. 296 and 0. 230 respectively(P 〈 0. 01). Eventually,an evaluation index system consisting of 5 first - grade indicators,13 second - grade indicators,46 third - grade indicators and their weights were established. Conclusion In this study,we established a core competency evaluation index system for health management professionals. The system is scientific and applicable,which can be used as an assessment tool for the evaluation of health management professionals.
分 类 号:R197[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31