检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈晋[1] 陈淼[1] 陈珍珍[1] 谢斯斯[1] 陈少敏[1]
机构地区:[1]温州医科大学附属第二医院
出 处:《医院管理论坛》2015年第9期20-22,共3页Hospital Management Forum
摘 要:目的评价群组管理对老年缺血性脑卒中患者的康复训练效果。方法连续性纳入2013年1月至2014年2月确诊为缺血性脑卒中患者且年龄>60岁,经入院治疗好转出院的随访病人169例,随机分成群组管理组(n=82)、常规干预组(n=87),群组管理组采用专门制定的群组管理措施,常规干预组采用常规的康复干预措施,6个月后,评价两组患者康复效果。结果干预6个月后,Barthel指数、Fegl-Mevyer评分均有提高,群组管理组提高幅度高于常规干预组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论群组管理对缺血性脑卒中患者的康复效果显著,值得应用推广。Objective To evaluate effectiveness of group management on rehabilitation training of elderly patients with ischemic stroke. Methods 169 patients, who were over 60 years old, diagnosed as ischemic stroke, admitted to and treated in our hospital and discharged from our hospital from January 2013 to February 2014, were randomly divided into group management group (n=82) and routine intervention group (n=87). The group management group adopted specially formulated group management. The routine intervention group adopted routine rehabilitation intervention measures. After 6 months, rehabilitation effects of two groups were evaluated. Results After 6 months of intervention, Barthel index and Fegl-Mevyer score increased in both groups, while the increases in group management group were higher than these in routine intervention group. The differences between groups were statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion The effect of group management on rehabilitation of patients with ischemic stroke was significant, thus the group management should be popularized.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28