社会学学科史书写的方法与政治  

The Methods and Politics of Sociological Disciplinary History

作　　者：何祎金[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院社会学研究所

出　　处：《社会学评论》2015年第5期38-49,共12页Sociological Review of China

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金面上资助“现代社会治理的早期探索:经验研究方法的历史实践”(2014M560156)

摘　　要：学科史讲述一门学科起源与发展的故事,内容上包括不同时期基本的理论、方法和学派的进展。不仅是学科形象的自我表达,更是提供学科集体认同的重要领域。但是,受社会变迁与不同社会思潮的影响,社会学的学科认同与对过去的书写并不是固定不变的。一方面,女性主义和后殖民社会学的兴起,挑战了传统社会学史中以西方为中心和男性化的写作立场;另一方面,对理论主导学科史内容的不满,亦使得过去受到忽视的主题和领域重新回归学科史的讨论。并且,侧重通过文本和概念建立来的社会学学科"内史",越来越受到"外化"历史的冲击。后者对社会学历史的呈现,目的不在于描述学术本身的内在逻辑与脉络。在不同历史情境下,这门学科的轨迹与实践,它在社会进程中所承担的角色和任务,成为学者所关注的主题。本文尝试从方法与政治两个方面,讨论不同取向及趋势的学科史书写,以及它们对非西方社会学理解这门学科和梳理自身历史所构成的挑战。Disciplinary history tells stories about the origin and development of one discipline. The content includes basic theories, methods and schools over different periods. It is an important area for pro- ducing self-portrait and collective identities of sociology. However, disciplinary history is not a fixed area. On the one hand, the rise of feminism and postcolonial sociology has challenged the Western centric and patriarchal disciplinary history; On the other hand, history dominated by theories has been rebuked and some previously neglected topics and fields have been refocused. Moreover, unlike the internal disciplin- ary history which merely focused on intellectual logic and context, the externalized history is concerned with the trajectory and practice of sociology in different historical contexts, and the role and mission under- taken by sociology in history. Thus, this paper intends to discuss the methods and politics of accounting disciplinary histories. Moreover, it also discusses new trends and orientations in disciplinary history. Dis- cussing the impact and challenge on non-Western sociologies in making their own history will also be in- cluded.

关 键 词：社会学 学科史 方法 政治 

分 类 号：C91-09[经济管理]