检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王鹏[1] 杨蕊[1] 崔学艳[1] 李妍[1] 李宏建[1] 苏乐群[1]
出 处:《中国药房》2015年第27期3797-3799,共3页China Pharmacy
基 金:国家科技支撑计划子课题(No.2013BAI06B04Y023039)
摘 要:目的:系统评价罗格列酮对比二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病的有效性和安全性,以为临床治疗提供循证参考。方法:计算机检索Pub Med、Medline、EMBase、Cochrane图书馆、中国期刊全文数据库、中文科技期刊数据库、万方数据库,收集罗格列酮(试验组)对比二甲双胍(对照组)治疗2型糖尿病有效性和安全性的随机对照试验(RCT),对符合纳入标准的临床研究进行资料提取和质量评价后,采用Rev Man 5.0统计软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入5项RCT,合计636例患者。Meta分析结果显示,试验组患者腹泻发生率[RR=0.23,95%CI(0.07,0.81),P=0.000]显著低于对照组,糖化血红蛋白水平[MD=0.22,95%CI(0.07,0.38),P=0.004]、水肿发生率[RR=0.20,95%CI(0.05,0.57),P=0.011]显著高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义;空腹血糖水平[MD=0.27,95%CI(-0.26,0.79),P=0.32]、恶心/呕吐发生率[RR=0.94,95%CI(0.06,0.89),P=0.692]比较,差异均无统计学意义。结论:二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病疗效优于罗格列酮,但临床应注意患者腹泻的发生。受纳入研究方法学质量和样本量限制,该结论有待更多设计严格、长期随访的大样本RCT加以验证。OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the efficacy and safety of rosiglitazone and metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, and provide evidence-based reference for the clinical treatment. METHODS: Retrieved from PubMed, Medline, EMBase, Cochrane Library, CJFD, VIP and Wanfang database, randomized controlled trials (RCT) about rosiglitazone (test group) and metformin (control group) in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. After data extract and quality evaluation, Meta-analysis was performed by using Rev Man 5.0 statistics software. RESULTS: A total of 5 RCT were included involving 636 patients. Re- sults of Meta-analysis showed the incidence of diarrhea [RR=0.23, 95% CI(0.07,0.81), P=0.000] in test groupwere significantly lower than control group, the HbA1c level [MD=0.22,95%CI(0.07,0.38),P=0.004],the incidence of edema [RR=0.20,95%CI (0.05,0.57), P= 0.011] in test group was significantly higher than control group, and there was no significant difference in the fast- ing blood glucose level[MD=0.27, 95% CI ( - 0.26, 0.79) , P=0.32], the incidence of nausea/vomiting [RR=0.94, 95% CI (0.06, 0.89), P=0.692]between 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin is more effective than rosiglitazone in the treatment of type 2 dia- betes, however, the incidence of diarrhea should be noticed. Due to the limit of methodological quality and sample size, it remains to be further verified with more rigorously designed and long-term follow-up of large-scale RCT.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117