日本行政限制竞争行为法律规制问题研究  

On the Regulation of Administrative Restriction of Competition of Japanese Anti-Monopoly Law

作　　者：李小明[1] 沈敏[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南大学法学院,湖南长沙410082

出　　处：《财经理论与实践》2015年第5期138-143,共6页The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics

基　　金：司法部2012年课题(12SFB5041)

摘　　要：日本反垄断法中没有行政垄断的定义,但确有行政机关利用行政权力排除限制竞争的行为,日本的经济规制及其统制型经济模式是其行为产生的原因。日本行政限制竞争行为主要表现为行政指导的卡特尔和行政参与的串通招标投标行为。日本采用禁止私人垄断法和行政法路径对行政限制竞争行为进行规制。日本采取行政、民事、刑事责任立法来规制行政限制竞争行为。我国应坚持行政垄断规制专门立法的特设制度,借鉴日本规制行政垄断的经验,并加大对行政垄断的处罚力度。Administrative monopoly is not particularly defined in Japanese Anti-Monopoly Law, but administrative restriction of competition really exists in the economic development in Japan because of its economic regulation and government controlled economy. Cartel of adminis- trative guide and administrative collusive bidding are main forms of administrative restriction of competition in Japan. Administrative restriction of competition is regulated pursuant to Japanese Anti-Monopoly Law and administrative law in Japan, and could be punished by administrative, civil and criminal liabilities. Administrative monopoly regulation should be particularly kept in Chinese Anti-Monopoly law, administrative guide is also treated as one of administrative restriction competition. China should reconstruct the way of regulation of administrative monopoly with a more severely punishment.

关 键 词：行政垄断 行政限制竞争 行政指导 经济规制 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]