检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学交通运输与物流学院,四川成都610031
出 处:《计算机集成制造系统》2015年第8期2170-2178,共9页Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目(10CGL013);四川省科技厅创新资助项目(2014-057);四川省科技厅软科学资助项目(2014ZR0046)~~
摘 要:针对供应链中供应商主导的信息泄露问题,探讨了供应商泄露信息的动机及在潜在信息泄露行为威胁下供应链其他成员的信息管理策略。多产销周期背景下由供应商、在位零售商及尝试进入市场的进入零售商组成的供应链系统,只有在位者才可预测到当期需求信息并决定是否与供应商共享需求信息,供应商决定是否将得到的信息泄露给进入者。在位者选择分离或混同策略以共享和隐藏需求信息。研究表明,首先行动的在位者将在低需求出现概率较大且需求变异系数较小时选择混同策略,否则选择分离策略,因此在位者合理的策略选择能够成功控制信息在供应链中的传播,同时实现期望收益的最大化。Aiming at the supplier's information leakage problem in supply chain, the leakage motivation of suppliers and the information management strategy of other supply chain's members under the threat of leakage behavior were discussed. In a setting of multi-period, a supply chain which consisted of a supplier, an incumbent and an entrant re- tailer was considered, and only the incumbent had demand information in advance. The incumbent decided whether to share demand information with the supplier, and the supplier decided whether to leak the information to the en- trant. The separating and pooling strategy were chose separately by incumbents to share and conceal the demand in- formation. The research result showed that the incumbents would choose pooling strategy when greater probability and smaller demand coefficient variation of low demand were appeared; otherwise, separating strategy would be chosen. Information transmission in the supply chain was controlled successfully with incumbent's reasonable strategy, and expected profits maximization was realized simultaneously.
分 类 号:F224[经济管理—国民经济] O227[理学—运筹学与控制论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117