检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]信阳师范学院政法学院,河南信阳464000 [2]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072
出 处:《信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年第5期43-47,共5页Journal of Xinyang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:2014年度最高人民法院审判理论重大课题
摘 要:审视近年来不断披露的冤假错案,不难发现任何一起冤假错案的形成都不是偶然的,而是各种因素合力作用的结果,尤其是应当对冤假错案的发生起着重要防范作用的审判环节,却因未能将程序公正的价值根植于法官内心,导致疑罪从无、非法证据排除、审判依法独立等原则在具体的审判实践中无法实现,是一批冤假错案发生的主要根源。需要坚持疑罪从无、非法证据排除、依法独立行使审判权三大原则,以求将冤假错案的发生率控制在最低的限度内。Examining the Miscarriages of justice which has happened in recent years, it is not difficult to find that any miscarriage of justice is not accidental, but the result of the joint effects of various factors. The trial should play an important role in preventing the occurrence of miscarriages of justice, because of the failure of inputting the value of procedural justice in the judge, the presumption of innocence, illegal evidence exclusion and judicial independence do lie in our law, but cannot be carried out in practice, which leads to a number of miscarriages of justice. So it is necessary to stick to the the principle of presumption of innocence and illegal evidence ex- clusion according to the independent exercise of judicial power, in order to control the incidence of miscarriages of justice in the mini-mum.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28