检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈立健[1] 刘朝阳[1] 周小渔[1] 尹强[1]
出 处:《临床医学工程》2015年第9期1131-1132,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering
摘 要:目的对比研究腹腔镜阑尾切除术和开腹阑尾切除术治疗小儿复杂性阑尾炎的临床效果。方法选取我院收治的74例复杂性阑尾炎患儿作为研究对象,根据手术方式的不同分为两组(各37例),开腹组行开腹阑尾切除术,腹腔镜组行腹腔镜阑尾切除术,比较两组患儿的手术疗效。结果两组患儿均顺利完成手术,腹腔镜组无一例中转开腹。腹腔镜组患儿的手术时间、下床活动时间、肛门排气时间、住院时间均显著短于开腹组,术中出血量明显少于开腹组(P<0.05);腹腔镜组患儿的术后疼痛、切口感染、肠粘连、腹腔脓肿发生率均显著低于开腹组(P<0.05)。结论相比于开腹阑尾切除术,腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗小儿复杂性阑尾炎的创伤更小、并发症发生率更低、术后恢复更快、住院时间更短,是一种安全、有效的治疗手段。Objective To compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy in the treatment of children with complicated appendicitis. Methods 74 cases of children with complicated appendicitis admitted to our hospital were selected as research objects, and divided into the open surgery group (n = 37, open appendectomy) and the laparoscope group (n = 37, laparoscopic appendectomy). The surgical effects of two groups were compared. Results All 74 cases were operated smoothly, and no intra-operative conversion to open surgery occurred. The mean operation time, ground activity time, anal exhaust time and length of hospital stay of laparoscope group were significantly shorter than those of open surgery group, and the intraoperative blood loss of laparoscope group was significantly less than that of open surgery group (all P 〈0.05). The incidences of postoperative pain, wound infection, intestinal adhesion, abdominal abscess of laparoscope group were significantly lower than those of open surgery group (P〈0.05). Conclusions Compared with open appendectomy, laparoscopic appendectomy has less trauma, lower incidence of complications, faster postoperative recovery and shorter hospital stay for children with complicated appendicitis, which is a safe and effective treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.121.190