检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张婉秋[1]
出 处:《西南石油大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第5期86-93,共8页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:刑事责任是刑法的基本范畴之一,其根据更是在价值功能上具有基础理论的意义。关于刑事责任根据,传统上存在三种理论:犯罪构成根据说、社会危害性根据说、危害性与危险性统一根据说。在这三种理论中,犯罪构成根据说自相矛盾,社会危害性根据说不够全面,危害性与危险性统一根据说欠缺说服力。从国家角度来看,维护基本的社会利益,保护全体社会成员的基本人权是国家设定刑事责任第一个层次的根据;从行为角度看,犯罪行为对社会的威胁是设立刑事责任第二个层次的根据;从行为人角度看,消极的人格态度是产生危害、也是决定刑事责任第三个层次的根据,综合上述三个层次的分析,可进一步将刑事责任的根据统一于罪过。Criminal responsibility is a basic concept in criminal law,and its foundation is of significant theoretical value. There once were three theories about the foundation of criminal responsibility,which were contradicting,imbalanced or unconvincing. At national level,protecting the basic social interest and all members’basic rights of the society is the first dimension of its foundation. The second dimension of the foundation can be seen in the threat of criminal behavior. And the third dimension of the foundation is the negative attitude of the conductor which brings harm and damage. According to the above analysis,the foundation of criminal responsibility can be integrated into fault liability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38