物权请求权制度之存废与民法体系的选择  

The Existence or Abolishment of the Right of the Real Claim and the Choice of the Civil Law System

作　　者：秦静云 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871

出　　处：《现代法学》2015年第4期89-99,共11页Modern Law Science

摘　　要：学界关于物权请求权的存废之争实为民法体系的选择之争;但无论是潘德克顿民法体系,还是权利—义务—责任体系,在其各自体系之内均无法完全逻辑一致地得以贯彻。未来我国民法体系的构建,首先,应当摒弃物权与债权抽象化的思维方式,将物权、债权概念仅作为财产权利的两个种类;其次,将原权利与救济权的区分作为民法体系的一条暗线来贯彻,即不需要通过构建独立的请求权体系或责任法体系来体现。在完善后的民法体系当中,物权请求权制度能够和谐地融入到完善后的潘德克顿体系当中;通过物权请求权制度对物权进行保护符合立法的科学性、司法适用的方便性要求。因此,物权请求权制度有存在必要性。The argument about the existence or abolishment of the right of real claim in fact is about the right of the civil law system ; but neither Pan Deketen civil law system nor the right-obligation-responsibility system is fully logical. The future of the civil law system in our country, first of all, should put an end to the abstract thinking mode of real right and creditor＇ s rights, see them as two species of property rights ; Second, we should carry out the theory of the original rights and right of relief as a dark line in civil law system, which don＇ t need to build an independent system of right of claim or liability law system. Because the right of real claim can integrate into the improved law system ; and it is in accordance with the scientific nature of the legis- lation and judicial application convenience. Therefore, the real right claim system is indispensable.

关 键 词：物权请求权 潘德克顿民法体系 权利—义务—责任民法体系 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]