检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]一汽总医院,长春130011
出 处:《中国卫生标准管理》2015年第25期240-241,共2页China Health Standard Management
摘 要:目的 对复合性外伤患者的急救方法和护理措施进行探究和总结。方法 选取我院于2014年4月-2015年6月收治的96例复合性外伤患者,将其作为研究对象。运用随机数字表法,分为观察组和对照组,每组患者48例,对照组采用常规急救和护理办法,观察组患者则采用程序化急救护理,对比两组患者的抢救治疗效果。结果 观察组急诊时病死率、住院后病死率分别为12.5%、4.1%,低于对照组的20.8%、10.4%(P〈0.05);观察组经抢救后住院治疗比率为83.3%,高于对照组的68.8%(P〈0.05)。结论 对于复合性外伤患者采取程序化急救护理办法,能大大提高抢救效率,为患者的抢救治疗争取宝贵时间,并实现抢救成功率的提高,患者死亡率下降。Objective To explore and summarize the composite first aid and trauma care measures. Methods Our hospital in April 2014 to June 2015 were treated 96 cases of complex trauma patients,as a study,using randomly divided into observation group and control group of 48 patients,the control group received routine first aid and care options,patients are observed using the procedures of emergency care,emergency treatment effect comparison of two groups of patients. Results The study group emergency mortality after hospital mortality was 12.5%,4.1%,significantly lower than the 20.8% in the control group,10.4%(P〈 0.05),observation group was rescued after hospitalization rate was 83.3% significantly higher than the 68.8%(P〈 0.05). Conclusion For complex trauma patients to take programmatic approach to emergency care,can greatly improve the efficiency of the rescue,the emergency treatment of patients for their time,and achieve improve the success rate of patient mortality,should be promoted and used in clinical practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171