检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李江花[1,2] 沈萌红[2] 陈俊华[1,2] 李强[1,2] 孙珂琪[1,2]
机构地区:[1]太原科技大学机械工程学院,太原030024 [2]浙江大学宁波理工学院机械与能源工程学院,浙江宁波315000
出 处:《机械工程师》2015年第9期112-117,共6页Mechanical Engineer
基 金:国家海洋局可再生能源专项资金资助项目(NBME2011CL02)
摘 要:潮流流速呈周期性变化,针对水平轴定桨距桨叶中设计流速的参数选取问题,以捕能总量最优为目标,结合流体动力学、叶素动量理论与贝茨理论,推导并建立桨叶设计流速与周期捕获总能之间的数学模型,对实验地点的海水流速变化进行测试,计算桨叶的设计流速。采用Wilson叶片优化设计方法,同时另取最大潮流流速为设计流速,与上述设计方法进行对比设计,利用MATLAB软件得到直径为1.3m两种桨叶的外形参数。通过海上实验平台对桨叶性能测试对比,结果表明该方法的设计桨叶在大部分低流速时间段内的功率捕获高于其对比桨叶,与理论对比计算值相符,实现周期内捕获总能最优,为变流速海域的桨叶设计提供参考。Due to the cyclical changes of tidal current velocity,this paper aims to select design velocity of fixed-pitch blade,the energy capture device. With the optimal capture efficiency in the cycle as the goal and combined with blade element momentum theory,fluid dynamics and theory of Bates,we deduce and establish the mathematical model between design flow velocity and the total energy captured by the blade in the cycle. Furthermore,the water velocity variation of the experimental site is tested,the designed flow velocity is calculated. The maximum flow velocity is taken as the design velocity,and Wilson's blade optimization design method is used to compare the above design method. Blade shape parameters of 1.3m blade diameter are obtained by MATLAB software. Blade properties on the test platform are tested and compared,and the results show that the blade using this design method captures higher power than the comparative blades in most time of the low velocity changing,which is consistent with the theoretical values and can capture optimal energy in the cycle. The results can provide theoretical basis for blade design in sea area with variable velocity.
分 类 号:TK79[动力工程及工程热物理—流体机械及工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15