国资委法律性质研究  

On Legal Nature of SASAC

作　　者：胡国梁[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《湖南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第3期86-91,共6页Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目(13&ZD032);国家社科基金项目(11BFX041);中南大学研究生自主探索创新项目(2013zzts110)

摘　　要：国资委的产生与演变对国有企业的改革具有一定的进步意义,但将其定性为国务院直属正部级特设机构却存在较大的缺陷。一方面,这会强化其不应有的行政管理色彩,造成国资委与一般行政机关等同的错觉,并致使国资委纵向关系陷入处理困境;另一方面,国资委应当具有的独立性难以体现,最终会影响其履职效果。对国资委性质的反思和重构必须首先明确国资委手中权力的性质。认真梳理国内外经济、国家机构和制度的演变历程可以发现,国资委的权力应当是一种国家调制权,由此,国资委也应当是一种国家调制机构。The generation as well as the evolution of SASAC （ State - owned Assets Supervision and Ad- ministration Commission） have a progressive significance on the reform of state - owned enterprises. However, it has larger defects to take SASAC as a special ministerial agency directly under the State Council. On the one hand, this will strengthen its undue administrative color, and create the false impression that SASAC is equivalent to ordinary administration organs, which will bring the SASAC＇s vertical relation to the plights. On the other hand, it is difficult to reflect the independence that SASAC should have, which will eventually affect the SASAC＇s perform - duty effect. If we want know the reflection and reconstruction of the nature of SASAC, we should clear the nature of their power first. We can find that the power of SASAC should be a national modulation power after we carefully comb the evolution of the international and domestic economy and national institutions as well as its system. As a result, SASAC should also be a kind of National institute of modulation.

关 键 词：国资委 出资人 国家调制权 

分 类 号：D912.29[政治法律—民商法学]