试析胡思敬对王夫之《读通鉴论》的指摘  

An Analysis of Hu Sijing's Criticism of Wang Fuzhi's DUTONGJIANLUN

作　　者：李泽昊[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海大学文学院历史系,上海200444

出　　处：《史学史研究》2015年第3期32-37,共6页Journal of Historiography

摘　　要：王夫之这位明末清初著名思想家,在近代著名史家胡思敬心目中,是一位捍卫道统,传承风教的正统大儒形象。为"去其小疵,存其大纯",胡思敬著述《王船山〈读通鉴论〉辨正》一书,较为系统地考察了《读通鉴论》的偏颇之处。本文在详细论述《王船山〈读通鉴论〉辨正》的时代背景、主要内容、史论特点后认为,是书不仅是研究王夫之学术思想不可忽视的参考资料,而且也是清末民初保守派史家历史撰述的一个典型,其在中国史学史和思想史上都具有一定的意义和价值。To the mind of Hu Sijing, a famous modern historian, Wang Fuzhi as a great thinker in the age of late Ming and early Qing was an orthodox Confucian and he inherited civilization. Hu Sijing wrote the book WANGCHUANSHAN DUTONGJIANLUN BIANZHENG, which investigated systematically the bias in DUTONGJIANLUN, to eliminate flaws and chalk up good points in it. The study of background, major coverage and characteristics of historical commentary of Hu＇ s book reflects that it is not only reference material for studying academic thought of Wang Fuzhi, but a model of historical writings by conservative historians in the age of late Qing and early the Republic of China, so it＇ s meaningful in Chinese historiography and intellectual history of China.

关 键 词：胡思敬 《王船山〈读通鉴论〉辨正》 王夫之 《读通鉴论》 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]