普鲁塔克著作的分类与命名传统  

A Research on Tradition of the Division and Title of Plutarch's Works

作　　者：张元伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学历史学院,吉林长春130024

出　　处：《史学史研究》2015年第3期75-83,共9页Journal of Historiography

基　　金：东北师范大学"中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金"(项目编号:14ZZ2141)阶段性成果

摘　　要：普鲁塔克的《传记集》和《道德论集》,实际来自后世对其126篇存世著作的分类汇编。这一格局初见于公元三、四世纪的《兰普里亚斯书目》,后随著作主要抄本、印本、译本编纂的变化而逐渐成型。国内学界在谈及此两个著作集时,往往将其误作普鲁塔克当时写成的两部书。而以《希腊罗马名人传》命名所有50篇存世传记的做法,虽效仿文艺复兴时期阿米约法译本和诺斯英译本,却忽略了两者特定的文化背景和时代特征,同时也与其中46篇以希腊—罗马形式配对写成的《对传》相混淆。《传记集》和《对传》的内容性质并不相同,研究中应区别对待。The Plutarch＇ s works are twofold, Plutarch＇ s Lives and Moralia, which is the outcome of a long tradition of Plutarch＇ s texts＇ transmission and reception of his 126 books. This division formed in the Lamprias Catalogue which was composed in the third or fourth century, and afterwards, various versions in manuscripts, editions and translations gradually formulated the present situation. Chinese scholars have misunderstood the two compiled corpora as two single books composed by Plutarch at his time. The Chinese title of the 50 Lives, The Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans, imitating the Renaissance version of Amyot＇ s French translation and North＇ s English translation though, not only ignored their cultural backgrounds and the characteristics of their times, but also confused them with the extent 46 Parallel Lives which Plutarch composed in a unique frame by juxtaposing Greeks and Romans to compare. Plutarch＇s Lives and Parallel Lives are different in their contents and concepts and should not be interchanged in use.

关 键 词：普鲁塔克 《希腊罗马名人传》 《对传》 分类 命名 

分 类 号：K091[历史地理—历史学]