检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国传媒大学经济与管理学院,北京100024
出 处:《日本问题研究》2015年第4期54-58,共5页Japanese Research
基 金:教育部2011年人文社会科学青年基金项目(11YJC860019);2014年北京市社科基金项目(14JGB074)
摘 要:日本与韩国电影产业的发展路径比较相像,两国票房收入均位居全球前十。文章在分析两国电影产业发展情况的基础上,对两国电影票房、电影产品出口占国际市场份额、电影贸易竞争力指数及电影产品输出扶持政策进行了比较。从绝对规模看,日本电影创造的票房收入要高于韩国;但从对国际市场的影响看,无论是电影产品出口占国际市场份额还是电影贸易竞争力指数,日本电影都出现了国际竞争力减弱的征兆;从扶持政策看,两国均从资金扶持、产品输出、人才培养等方面着力保护国产电影的竞争力。The development path of film industry is similar in Japan and South Korea, and both of the two countries' box-office are in the top ten of the world. We compared the two countries' movie box office, the share of film export products in the world market, the film trade competitiveness index and the public policies of film export. From the perspective of absolute scale, the box office in Japan is higher than that of South Korea. But from the view of the impact on the international market, both the share of film products export in the world market and the film trade competitiveness index show that the international competitiveness of Japanese film industry is falling. As far as the support policy is concerned, the two countries have made efforts in terms of financial support, product output and personnel training to protect the competitiveness of domestic film industries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222