2种微创术式治疗输尿管嵌顿结石比较  

Comparison the Healing Effect between two Ki nds of Minimally Invasive Operation for Impacted Upper Ureternal Calculi

作　　者：齐强元[1] 孟凡敏[1] 熊升远[1] 徐英民[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东省临沂市沂水中心医院泌尿外科,山东临沂276400

出　　处：《中国伤残医学》2015年第20期10-11,共2页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine

摘　　要：目的：对2种微创术式对治疗输尿管嵌顿性结石的治疗效果进行对比。方法：选取我院收治嵌顿性输尿管结石患者65例，分为32例GRLUL组、33例PCNL组，对2组患者临床资料进行回顾性的分析。结果：研究发现，GRLUL组手术时间与PCNL组时间比较，GRLUL组结石清除率高于PCNL组，差异无统计学意义（p＞0．05）。结论：PCNL和GRLUL在输尿管嵌顿性结石治疗中均有满意的结石清除率，术后恢复快及术后并发症少的优点。Objective：The two minimally invasive surgical treatment of ureteral calculi incarcerated treatment were compared.Meth-ods：Patients with ureteral stones in our hospital incarcerated 65 cases were divided into 32 cases GRLUL group, 33 cases of PCNL group, two groups of patients for clinical data were analyzed retrospectively.Results：The study found that, GRLUL operative time compared with the time PCNL group, the difference was statistically significant （p ＆lt;0.05）.Conclusions：PCNL and GRLUL are satisfied stone clear-ance rate in the treatment of ureteral calculi incarcerated, rapid postoperative recovery advantages and fewer complications.

关 键 词：经皮肾造瘘术 普通腹腔镜 超声碎石取石 

分 类 号：R693[医药卫生—泌尿科学]