机构地区:[1]山东省聊城市第二人民医院生殖中心,252601
出 处:《中国医药》2015年第10期1505-1509,共5页China Medicine
摘 要:目的 探讨未成熟卵泡穿刺术(IMFP)和口服避孕药(OC)治疗多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)不孕患者的效果.方法 选择201 1年8月至2013年7月在聊城市第二人民医院生殖医学科接受治疗的PCOS不孕患者共149例,完全随机分为IMFP组(75例)和OC组(74例).IMFP组行IMFP,根据监测的基础内分泌水平以及窦卵泡数,可连续行2~3个周期;OC组口服短效避孕药治疗3个周期.2组分别在治疗后监测排卵,并指导同房.比较2组治疗前后基础内分泌水平、卵巢体积大小和窦卵泡数目以及治疗后月经恢复率、排卵率及妊娠率.结果 IMFP组和OC组治疗后黄体生成素、睾酮、黄体生成素/卵泡刺激素、卵巢体积及基础窦卵泡数均明显低于治疗前[IMFP组:(6.3±0.6)IU/L比(12.6±1.3)IU/L、(1.05±0.22) nmol/L比(4.47±0.43) nmol/L、(0.63±0.25)比(2.52 ±0.33)、(7.1±0.3)cm3比(12.2±1.3) cm3、(9±4)个/卵巢比(22±12)个/卵巢;OC组:(7.2±0.5)IU/L比(13.5±1.6)IU/L、(1.34±0.14)nmol/L比(4.35±0.56) nmol/L、(0.57±0.35)比(2.44±0.42) 、(9.2 ±3.3)cm3比(11.9±3.7)cm3、(1 1±3)个/卵巢比(22±11)个/卵巢],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).IMFP组和OC组治疗前后卵泡刺激素水平比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).IMFP组治疗后卵巢体积及基础窦卵泡数变化幅度均大于OC组[(4.2±2.9)cm3比(2.9±2.6)cm3、(14±6)个/卵巢比(8±4)个/卵巢],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).IMFP组月经恢复率、排卵率、妊娠率均高于OC组[41.3%(31/75)比21.6% (16/74)、41.3% (31/75)比35.1%(26/74)、30.7%(23/75)比14.9%(11/74)],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).结论 IMFP和OC治疗PCOS不孕均疗效确切,但IMFP在减小卵巢体积、减少窦卵泡数、改善月经和排卵情况及远期妊娠率方面更优于OC.Objective To compare the efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound guided immature follicte puncture (IMFP) and oral contraceptive (OC) treating infertility patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).Methods One hundred and forty-nine infertility patients with PCOS were enrolled and randomly divided into IMFP group (75 cases) undergoing IMFP for 2-3 cycles according to the basal endocrinology and basic number of follicles,and OC group (14 cases) received OC for 3 cycles.The spontaneous ovulation was monitored after treatment;the patients were guided to perform sexual intercourse.The basal endocrinology,ovary volume and basic follicle number were observed before and after treatment;the menstrual period,spontaneous ovulation and pregnancy rate after treatment were compared between the two groups.Results The levels of testosterone,luteinizing hormone (LH),LH/FSH ratio,ovary volume and basic follicle number were all declined after treatments compared with those before treatment in IMFP group [(1.05 ± 0.22) nmol/L vs (4.47 ± 0.43) nmol/L,(6.3±0.6) IU/L vs (12.6±1.3) IU/L,(0.63±0.25) vs (2.52±0.33),(7.1 ±0.3) cm3 vs (12.2±1.3) cm3,(9±4)/ovary vs (22 ±12) /ovary] and OC group [(1.34±0.14) nmol/L vs (4.35±0.56) nmol/L,(7.2 ± 0.5) IU/L vs (13.5 ± 1.6) IU/L,(0.57 ± 0.35) vs (2.44 ± 0.42),(9.2 ± 3.3) cm3 vs (1 1.9 ± 3.7) cm3,(11 ± 3)/ovary vs (22 ± 11)/ovary] (all P 〈 0.05).The level of follicle-stimulating hormone was not significantly changed after treatment in both groups (P 〉 0.05).The variability degrees of ovary volume and basic follicle number in IMFP group were significantly greater than those in OC group [(4.2 ±2.9) cm3 vs (2.9 ± 2.6) cm3,(14 ± 6)/ovary vs (8 ± 4)/ovary] (P 〈 0.05).The recovery rate of menstrual period,spontaneous ovulation rate and pregnancy rate in IMFP group were all higher than those in OC group [41.3% (31/75)vs21.6% (16/74),41
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...