“软制衡”理论的内在逻辑与实证分析  

The Inherent Logic and Empirical Analysis of "Soft Balancing" Theory

作　　者：谢立忱[1] 齐淑杰[2] 

机构地区：[1]山西师范大学历史与旅游文化学院 [2]山西师范大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《西亚非洲》2015年第5期81-97,共17页West Asia and Africa

基　　金：山西省高等学校哲学社会科学重点研究基地项目"西亚国际关系中的认同因素"(2012322)资助

摘　　要："软制衡",是因应冷战后针对美国的"硬制衡"的明显缺位或不足,而于21世纪初开始频现于国际关系领域的一个新概念。作为传统制衡行为的变种,"软制衡"有着明显区别于"硬制衡"的战略目标、理论逻辑和机制。次等大国之所以对美国采取"软制衡"战略,主要在于单极结构压力与制衡的实力"门槛"与美国霸权合法性的下降、应对"硬制衡"的难题与实力性质的变化,以及国际体系内部要素与互动属性的变更等五方面原因。中国和俄罗斯在联合国安理会上就叙利亚问题进行的战略协调与外交合作,便是反对美国的典型"软制衡"实例。The ＂Soft balancing＂, as a variant of the traditional balancing act, is obviously different from ＂The hard balancing＂ in strategic goals, theoretical logic and mechanism. There are mainly five reasons for second -ranked powers taking ＂Soft balancing＂ strategy against the United States, namely unipolar structure stress and the power ＂threshold＂ of the balancing, the decline of US hegemonic legitimacy, the problem of hard balancing, the change of power characters, and the change of the international system＇ s internal elements and interactive properties. Strategic coordination and diplomatic cooperation between China and Russia on the Syrian issue in the UNSC is the typical behavior of soft balancing against the United States.

关 键 词：“软制衡” 大国 美国 叙利亚危机 

分 类 号：D80[政治法律—政治学] D871.2[政治法律—外交学]