产品责任归责原则之反思与确立  

A Reflection on the Principles for Attributing Product Liability

作　　者：沈向华[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学法学院

出　　处：《首都师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第5期76-84,共9页Journal of Capital Normal University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：中国通说将无过错责任作为产品责任的归责原则在教义学体系上存在严重矛盾,其背后的法政策考量也存在明显不当。比较法上产品责任的流变过程及其最新发展都表明产品责任普遍采用的归责原则是过错推定。在中国的侵权法体系中,产品责任并非危险责任,其本质为违反安全保障义务的间接侵权责任,以此为基础,产品责任的归责原则其实是过错推定而非无过错。The most popular theory in China takes no-fault as the principle for product liability attribution. There is a most serious inner contradiction in terms of juris doctrine, which leads to misleading policy considerations. Both the changing process and the latest developments of product liability in comparative law show that the popularly accepted reputation principle for product liability attribution is fault presumption. In Chinese tort law, product liability is not danger liability, but indirect tort liability. Based on this, the reputation principle of product liability is fault presumption instead of no-fault.

关 键 词：产品责任 归责原则 间接侵权 过错推定 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]