检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广西医科大学人文社会科学学院,广西南宁530021
出 处:《中国医学伦理学》2015年第5期706-708,共3页Chinese Medical Ethics
摘 要:运用SWOT分析法对我国医疗纠纷第三方调解机制存在的优势与劣势,面临的机会与威胁进行系统分析,提出了完善医疗纠纷第三方调解机制的对策:加大宣传力度,努力消除公众的认知误区;健全相关法律法规,严格约束调解机构的行为;构建长效培训机制,提高调解员的资质;构建涉及医患双方和调解机构的多维度评价体系,提高绩效评价的全面性;逐步推行强制医疗责任险,保障医疗纠纷赔偿的资金来源。This paper used SWOT analysis to explore the advantages , disadvantages , opportunities and threats of the third-party mediation mechanism of medical disputes .For perfecting third-party mediation mechanism of medical disputes , the authors also put forward some ways:intensifying propaganda , efforts to eliminate public per-ception error; improving the relevant laws and regulations , strict constraints mediation organization behavior; to build a long-term training mechanism , to improve the qualification of the mediators , building both doctors and mediation mechanism of multi -dimensional evaluation system , improve the comprehensive performance evaluation;gradually introduced mandatory medical liability insurance , guarantee of medical dispute compensation funding .
分 类 号:R197.32[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15