认知二维语义学与克里普克理论之关系探析  

Analysis of the Relation Between Epistemic Two-Dimensional Semantics and Kripke's Theories

作　　者：陈吉胜[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学马克思主义学院哲学所,武汉430079

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2015年第10期3-7,共5页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

摘　　要：查莫斯宣称,他的认知二维语义学承认克里普克的模态与意义理论,并分别从模态论证与认知论证两个方面论述了这一点。但是,认知二维语义学诉诸模态理性主义一元论,而该理论违背了克里普克对认知模态与形而上模态的划分;并且,如果认知内涵框架可以整合指称的因果机制,那么,认知内涵就应当是一种元语义成分。因此,认知二维语义学并未真正地完全接受克里普克的模态与意义理论。Chalmers claimed that his epistemic two-dimensional semantics admitted Kripke＇s theories of modality and meaning, and argued for this from modal argument and epistemic argument respectively. However, what the epistemic two-dimensional semantics invokes to is modal rationalism monism, which violates the distinction between epistemic modality and metaphysical modality made by Kripke; and, if epistemic intension can integrate the causal mechanism of reference, then it will be metasemantical component. Therefore, it is not that epistemic two-dimensional semantics admits the theories of modality and meaning of Krioke really and comoletelv.

关 键 词：认知二维语义学 认知模态 形而上模态 语义学 元语义学 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]