机构地区:[1]河南省人民医院皮肤科,河南郑州450003 [2]郑州大学第一附属医院皮肤科,河南郑州450052
出 处:《中国皮肤性病学杂志》2015年第10期1100-1102,共3页The Chinese Journal of Dermatovenereology
基 金:河南省重点科技攻关项目(122102310539)
摘 要:目的探讨碱性成纤维细胞生长因子(rb FGF)联合雅漾活泉修护霜(ACRSC)对点阵激光治疗痤疮瘢痕术后创面的影响。方法 66例痤疮瘢痕患者分为对照组(A组)、ACRSC组(B组)和rb FGF与ACRSC联合治疗组(C组),均采用MCL30铒点阵激光(德国阿司克莱)治疗,创面皮肤出现少量渗血、渗液即终止,共治疗3次,间隔时间为2个月。术后所有患者均使用雅漾活泉喷雾冷敷创面,3次/d,每次20min。对照组于点阵激光治疗后未再使用药物;ACRSC组术后第3天起在皮损处外用使用ACRSC,1次/d,共1个月。联合治疗组于点阵激光治疗后4h后皮损部位使用rb FGF,3次/d至痂皮完全脱落,术后第3天开始在皮损处外用ACRSC,1次/d,共1个月。随访由两位主治医师接诊,分别于激光术后第3,7,14,30,60天评估患者的红肿时间、渗出时间、脱痂时间、红斑持续时间和患者的满意度,结合患者术前术后照片及临床问卷调查资料共同判定疗效。结果所有受试者未见色素减退、感染及瘢痕增生等不良反应。ACRSC组红肿、渗出时间与对照组相比较[(2.96±1.34)d vs(3.26±1.43)d,(2.09±0.59)d vs(2.45±0.65)d]差异无统计学意义(均P﹥0.05),联合治疗组与对照组相比较[(2.72±1.31)d vs(3.26±1.43)d,(1.99±0.63)d vs(2.45±0.65)d]比较差异有统计学意义(均P﹤0.05);3组在脱痂时间和红斑持续时间上两两相比差异均具有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。结论 rb FGF联合ACRSC能够加速点阵激光术后创面的愈合,减少红斑及色素沉着等不良反应的发生。Objective To study effectiveness of the united application of rbFGF and ACRSC on postoperative wound - healing in treatment of ache scar using fractional Erbium laser MCL30. Methods Sixty-six patients with ache scar were divided into control group (group A, 12 cases) ,ACRSC group (group B,27 cases) and united treatment group (group C ,27 cases) . All patients were treated 3 times with interval 2 months using fractional Erbium laser MCL30 and terminated whose skin was appearing little amount of bleeding or drainage. Postoperative wound-cooling with avene cicalfate spray was applied by 3 times a day, 20 minutes each time. Group A was only treated by fractional Erbium laser MCL30 with no drugs; group B was done with ACRSC (1 time per day) from postoperative 3rd day( 1 month in total) ;and group C was applicated jointly with rbFGF ( 3 times a day)from postoperative 4th hour and with ACRSC (1 time per day) from postoperative 3 rd day ( 1 month in total) . The results of effect and follow-up including seepage time, callus time , duration of erythema and patients' satisfaction in postoperative 3rd,7th, 14th,30th and 60th day were assessed by two doctors. Results There were no pigment loss,infection , scar hyperplasia, and other adverse reactions in the whole groups. There were no obviously statistical significance in redness, seepage time between B and Agroups [ ( 2.96 ± 1.34) d vs ( 3.26 ± 1.43 ) d, (2. 09 ± 0. 59 ) d vs (2.45 ±0. 65 ) d) ] ( P 〉 0.05 ), while there were obvious differences compared group C with group A [ (2. 72 ± 1.31 ) d vs ( 3.26 ±1.43 ) d, ( 1.99 ±0. 63)d vs( 2. 45 ±0. 65)d) ] (P 〈 0. 05). Compared by debridement and erythema,three groups have obvious differences (P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion It is a kind of feasible, safe, effective method on accelerating postoperative wound-healing with few side-effects , and has good cosmetic effect.
分 类 号:R758.733[医药卫生—皮肤病学与性病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...