检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑东晗[1] 金元哲[1] 段志英[1] 林英子[1] 张学颖[1] 王婧如[1] 韩硕[1] 王国锋[1] 张一径[1]
机构地区:[1]中国医科大学附属第四医院心血管病治疗中心,辽宁沈阳110032
出 处:《心血管康复医学杂志》2015年第5期476-480,共5页Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
基 金:辽宁省科技计划项目(2009225010-8)~~
摘 要:目的:研究社区35~64周岁居民中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(N/L)与心血管病传统危险因素的关系。方法:2011年4月至2012年2月在沈阳市城区1884名居民(男548例,女1336例)中进行了心血管病及其相关疾病的基线情况调查。根据是否具有心血管危险因素,入选者被分为健康对照组(675例)和危险因素组(1209例);根据具有的危险因素数量,危险因素组被进一步分为1个危险因素组(491例)、2个危险因素组(263例)和≥3个危险因素组(455例)。所有对象留取清晨血样、尿样检测血常规、尿常规、血糖、血脂等,比较分析各组的N/L比值。结果:在只有高血压、糖尿病、血脂异常、肥胖中任一危险因素的患者中,高血压和糖尿病患者的N/L水平显著高于健康对照组[1.55(1.15,1.95),1.60(1.21,2.07)比1.45(1.09,1.91)],P均〈0.05,其余危险因素亚组与健康对照组间均无显著差异(P均〉0.05)。在危险因素亚组间,≥3个危险因素组的N/L水平显著高于2个危险因素组[1.57(1.16,2.04)比1.41(1.07,1.89),P〈0.051,其余各组问无显著差异(P〉0.05)。结论:中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值与高血压和糖尿病显著有关,且≥3个危险因素组的N/L水平显著高于2个危险因素组,N/L比值有助于评估心血管疾病风险。Objective: To study the relationship between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (N/L) and traditional cardio- vascular risk factors among community 35~64-year-old residents. Methods: A total of 1884 residents (548 males and 1336 females) from urban Shenyang city received baseline condition questionnaire on cardiovascular diseases and re- lated diseases from Apr 2011 to Feb 2012. According to presence of cardiovascular risk factors or not, subjects were divided into healthy control group (n = 675) and risk factor group (n = 1209) ; according to number of risk factors, risk factor group was further divided into one risk factor group (n = 491), two risk factors group (n = 263) and 〉1/3 risk factors group (n = 455). Morning blood sample and urine sample were retained to measure blood and urine rou- tine, blood glucose and blood lipid profile etc in all subjects. N/L was compared and analyzed among all groups. Re- suits: Among patients with only one of following risk factors [-hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia and obesity], N/L levels of patients with hypertension or DM were significantly higher than that of healthy control group [1.55(1.15, 1.95), 1.60(1.21, 2.07) vs. 1.45(1.09, 1.91)], P〈0.05 both, and there were no significant difference between any other one risk factor group and healthy control group, P〉0.05 all. Among risk factor sub- groups, N/L level of ≥3 risk factors group was significantly higher than that of two risk factors group [1.57(1.16, 2.04) vs. 1.41(1.07, 1.89), P〈0.05], and there was no significant difference between any other two groups (P〉 0.05). Conclusion: N/L significantly related to hypertension or DM, and N/L level of ≥3 risk factors group was sig- nificantly higher than that of two risk factors group, N/L is helpful to assess risk of cardiovascular diseases.
分 类 号:R540.9[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28