检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖北医药学院附属太和医院重症医学科,湖北十堰442000
出 处:《心血管康复医学杂志》2015年第5期565-568,共4页Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)治疗各种类型心肾综合征临床疗效。方法:心肾综合征247例患者根据病情被分为1型(47例)、2型(51例)、3型(55例)、4型(49例)、5型组(45例),所有患者接受连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT),分别在治疗前后不同时间测定超声心动图改变、血浆N末端B型利钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)水平评价心功能状态,测定24h尿量、内生肌酐清除率(Ccr)评价肾功能状态,观察CRRT治疗对各型心肾综合征疗效。结果:与治疗前比较,行CRRT1周后,各型心肾综合征患者LVEF、尿量、Ccr水平明显升高,NT—proBNP水平明显下降(P〈0.05或〈0.01)。与第4、5型组比较,第1、2、3型组LVEF[(48.98±1.55)%、(44.67±1.48)%比(55.13±4.27)%、(53.73±3.52)%、(57.95±2.89)%]、尿量[(1118.83±168.09)ml、(1125.47±177.28)ml比(1655.67±198.37)ml、(1697.47±171.27)ml、(1702.72±179.28)m1]、Ccr[(40.11±1.79)、(41.11±1.39)比(52.33±2.49)、(50.97±2.11)、(51.32±2.01)]水平升高更显著,NT-proBNP[(3738.19±118.77)、(3378.38±121.82)比(2137.51±123.59)、(2421.12±121.22)、(2139.81±147.28)]水平降低更显著(P均〈0.05)。结论:CRRT对各型心肾综合征均有效,但第1~3型优于第4、5型,这与各型心肾综合征病理机制不同有关。Objective: To observe therapeutic effect of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) on different types of cardiorenal syndrome (CRS). Methods.. According to patient's conclition, a total of 247 CRS patients were divided into type 1 group (n = 47), type 2 group (n = 51), type 3 group (n = 55), type 4 group (n = 49) and type 5 group (n = 45). All patients received CRRT, echoeardiography and plasma level of N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) detect to evaluate cardiac function status; the 24h urine volume and endogenous creatinine clearance rate (Ccr) were measured to assess renal function status before and after treatment. Results.. Compared with before treatment, on one week after CRRT, LVEF, urine volume and Ccr level significantly rose, NT-proBNP level significantly reduced (P〈0.05 or 〈0.01). Compared with type 4 and 5 group, there were significant rise in LVEF[(48.98±1.55)%, (44.67±1.48)% vs. (55.13±4.27)%, (53.73±3.52)%, (57. 95±2. 89) %], urine volume [(1118. 83± 168.09) ml, (1125.47 ± 177. 28) ml vs. (1655.67± 198. 37) ml, (1697.47± 171.27) ml, (1702.72±179.28) ml] and Ccr level [(40.11 ± 1.79), (41.11± 1.39) vs. (52.33±2.49), (50.97±2.11), (50. 32±2.01)], and significant reduction in NT-proBNP level [(3738.19± 118.77), (3378.38± 121.82) vs. (2137.51± 123.59), (2421.12±121.22), (2139.81± 147. 28)] in type 1, 2 and 3 group, P〈0.05 all. Conclusion CRRT is effective on different types of CRS, but it's best on type 1~3 than those of type 4~5, which may be re- lated to different pathological mechanisms of CRS different types .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117