检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山西医科大学公共卫生学院儿少卫生学教研室,太原030001
出 处:《中国学校卫生》2015年第9期1355-1357,共3页Chinese Journal of School Health
基 金:全国教育科学规划教育部青年课题项目(EHA090449)
摘 要:目的探讨父母教养方式与儿童伤害倾向的关系,为制定伤害高危儿童的家庭预防策略提供参考。方法随机选取太原市2所城区小学,整群选取四~五年级学生为调查对象。共发放671份问卷,回收有效问卷664份,回收率为99.0%,其中伤害次数缺失46份,最终问卷有618份。调查内容包括1 a中伤害发生情况以及父母教养方式。结果伤害发生倾向儿童组母亲拒绝否认和母亲因子惩罚严厉的平均得分均高于非伤害发生倾向儿童组,差异有统计学意义(t值分别为-2.013,-2.054,P值均〈0.05)。相关分析,母亲拒绝否认、母亲惩罚严厉均与伤害发生倾向呈正相关(r值分别为0.081,0.082,P值均〈0.05)。单因素Logistic回归分析提示,母亲拒绝否认、母亲惩罚严厉是伤害发生倾向的危险因素(OR值分别为1.051,1.047,P值均〈0.05)。结论父母教养方式与儿童伤害倾向有关。应有针对的指导改善家长对儿童的教养方式,以减少伤害发生。Objective To explore the relationship between parental rearing pattern and child injury proneness, and to pro- vide reference for injury prevention among high risk children. Methods Two primary schools in Taiyuan were randomly selected. All students from grade 4 and grade 5 were invited to participate. A total of 664 questionnaires in 671 were eligible. Forty-six students were lack of information on injury frequency. Data analysis was based on 618 questionnaires. Parenting rearing pattern and injury occurred in the past year was investigated. Results The average score of mother factor Ill and mother factor IV in the injury proneness group were higher than the no-injury proneness group( t =-2.013,-2.054,P〈0.05). Refuse to deny and punishment from mother were positively correlated with injury proneness. Refuse to deny ( OR = 1.051 ) and punishment ( OR = 1. 047 ) from mother were both risk factors for injury proneness. Conclusion Parental rearing style is related to child injury proneness. Child injury prevention could benefit from actions aimed at improving parents" knowledge on rearing practices.
分 类 号:R174.6[医药卫生—妇幼卫生保健] R195[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117