检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:鲁洋[1,2]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学 [2]北京仲裁委员会
出 处:《北京仲裁》2014年第3期132-146,共15页Beijing Arbitration Quarterly
摘 要:在全球化的大背景下,中国主要仲裁机构都在积极努力地朝着国际化方向发展,这种国际化在很大程度上表现为仲裁规则的设计与国际主流保持一致。就国际商事仲裁规则中实体法律适用条款的制定而言,以中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会、北京仲裁委员会为代表,中国仲裁机构中正出现一种采取“当事人未约定实体准据法时适用仲裁庭认为合适的法律”的趋势。这一方法对中国仲裁机构而言是比较陌生的,如何在实务操作中正确运用,需要中国仲裁工作者和研究者积极探讨。本文以该实体法律适用方法为中心,通过分析仲裁程序法与仲裁规则之间的关系,探究在中国国际商事仲裁案件中,仲裁庭应当如何正确运用上述方法确定实体准据法。In the background of globalization, major arbitration institutions of China's Mainland are pursuing developments toward internationalization, which, to a large extent, is in the form of designing the arbitration rules consistent with international trend. As to the substantive law applicable provisions in international commercial arbitration rules, a trend of adopting " applying the substantive law which the tribunal considers appropriate in the absence of any agreement by the parties" is taking place among Chinese arbitration institutions, which is represented by CIETAC and BAC. This method is comparatively inexperienced to Chinese arbitration institutions. Thus Chinese arbitration practitioners as well as researchers need to discuss how to use this method properly. Focusing on the above-mentioned substantive-law- applicable method, this thesis attempts to discuss how to apply the method correctly to decide the applicable substantive law in Chinese International Commercial Arbitration, by analyzing the relations between arbitration procedure law and arbitration rules.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15