工程造价鉴定司法实务研究  

作　　者：林文学 

机构地区：[1]最高人民法院立案二庭

出　　处：《北京仲裁》2014年第4期45-54,共10页Beijing Arbitration Quarterly

摘　　要：审判实践中工程造价司法鉴定存在以鉴代审严重、多次鉴定突出以及计价依据时有争议等问题。工程造价司法鉴定中审判权和鉴定权要有明确的行使范围。工程造价鉴定应坚持独立性原则和契约性原则。文章分析了鉴定机构的选择、鉴定资料的提供、鉴定意见的审查、鉴定人出庭义务以及补充鉴定与重新鉴定等实务问题,坚持鉴定费用由申请人预先支付、败诉方最终承担原则。当事人对造价鉴定机构的鉴定意见不服提起民事或者行政诉讼要求确认鉴定意见无效的,人民法院不予受理。In the judicial practice, Construction Cost identification exists such problems with the identification replace trial, of several times identification, and serious valuation basis. Jurisdiction and expertise right should be a clear scope. Should adhere to the principle of independence and contract. The court commissioned identification and self identification is analyzed. To make Clear the choice of identification organization, providing of identification material, reviewing of identification opinion, the obligation of appearing in court of appraiser, and of the supplementary identification and re-identification problem. To insist the principle of the cost incurred by the applicant to pay in advance, the losing party bears. The people＇s court shall not accept civil or administrative proceedings if the client refused the opinion of the Identification.

关 键 词：工程造价鉴定 鉴定权和审判权 独立性 鉴定费用 

分 类 号：D919.3[医药卫生—法医学]