检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西北农林科技大学园艺学院,陕西杨凌712100 [2]神木县园艺蚕桑工作站,陕西神木719300
出 处:《北方园艺》2015年第19期47-53,共7页Northern Horticulture
基 金:国家"十二五"科技支撑计划资助项目(2014BAD14B06)
摘 要:以新型双屋面日光温室和传统的4种日光温室进行性能对比研究,选取了2012年12月21日(冬至日)、12月23日(典型晴天)、2013年1月19日(典型阴天)和2014年1月21日16:00至1月22日14:00的试验数据,进行室内光照强度、气温、地温、相对湿度以及造价、空间、寿命等性能分析。研究新型双屋面日光温室的性能,为广大种植户寻求一种优化的温室结构。结果表明:新型日光温室与3种砖墙日光温室平均相比,室内平均气温提高了1.3℃,室内平均地表下0.1m处地温提高了1.7℃,室内平均光照强度降低了1.25%,室内平均相对湿度提高了3.98%;新型日光温室与寿光式土墙日光温室相比,室内平均温度降低了2.0℃,室内地温降低了0.2℃;新型日光温室造价较3种砖墙日光温室造价平均降低了38.68%,较寿光式土墙日光温室造价降低了9.12%;新型日光温室土地利用率较砖墙温室土地利用率平均提高了9.17%,较寿光式土墙日光温室土地利用率提高了44.01%。新型日光温室较砖墙温室温度高,相对湿度高,光照强度接近,跨度大,寿命优于土墙和砖墙温室;是一种优化的温室结构。A comparison study about new double roof solar greenhouse and traditional four solar greenhouse was conducted the experimental data of December 21 st,2012(winter solstice),December 23th(typical sunny),January 19,2013(typical cloudy)and from at 16:00on January 21 st,2014to at 14:00on January 22 th,the performance of indoor light intensity,temperature,ground temperature,relative humidity,and the cost,space,life and other research new dual roof solar greenhouse performance was studied,to seek a optimizatal greenhouse structure,for the majority of growers.The results showed that the new solar greenhouse with three kinds of brick wall in greenhouse average compared:indoor average temperature increase of 1.3℃,the indoor underground 0.1mat an average ground temperature improved 1.7℃,the average indoor light intensity low of 1.25%,the average indoor relative humidity improved 3.98%;new solar greenhouse Shouguang formula compared to the average temperature of the walls greenhouses low 2.0℃,indoor ground temperature low 0.2℃;the new solar greenhouse cost representing three kinds of brick in greenhouse cost reduced by an average38.68%,compared with the cost of solar greenhouse Shouguang style walls reduced 9.12%;new solar greenhouse land usage was brick greenhouse land utilization rate increased by an average 9.17%,compared with Shouguang formula walls in greenhouse land utilization by 44.01%compared with the brick wall of new solar greenhouse temperature,high relative humidity,light intensity close to the span,life was better than brick walls and greenhouses;.was an optimization of the greenhouse structure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.54.178