检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中南大学商学院,长沙410083
出 处:《管理科学学报》2015年第9期86-94,共9页Journal of Management Sciences in China
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71301169;71372063)
摘 要:在单资产的两期定价模型中,刻画了关注和疏忽两类投资者,在市场出清的均衡状态下发现提高信息关注度可以降低资产的风险溢价.将关注交易者进一步划分为信息关注者与噪声关注者后,关注度与风险溢价的关系依赖于噪声交易者在关注交易者中所占的比例:当噪声关注者比例较高时,关注度的提高会增加风险溢价,当噪声关注者的比例较低时,则相反.称这一结论为"关注者分类假说".引入理性预期的疏忽交易者后,其核心结论仍然成立.We specify attentive and inattentive investors in a two period model with a single risky asset. In themarket-clearing equilibrium, we find that the more attention investors pay to the relevant information, the low-er the risk premium they obtain. We divide the attentive investors into two categories: the investors who are at-tentive information and those who are attentive to noise, then, we find that the proportion of investors who areattentive to noise plays a vital role in determining the relationship between the attention level and the risk pre-mium. Given more attention paid to the noisy information, the increase in the number of attentive investorstends to raise the risk premium, but the effect turns negative when less attention is paid to the noisy informa-tion. We call this "attention classifying hypothesis"pectation, we obtain the similar conclusions.After introducing inattentive investors with rational ex-pectation, we obtain the similar conclusions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.135.79